Showing posts with label WSJ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WSJ. Show all posts
7/1/09
6/10/09
6/9/09
Help
is on the way. Scariest part of travel is dreading being wedged against fattest slob in departure lounge.
5/26/09
Where to even begin
with this now that it's finally broken through into "real" media? How many others were on the same trips and "reporting" for other holier-than-thou outlets? And this whole look-the-other-way approach to freelancers never fails to amaze me.
4/24/09
And no one said
a thing to me about it.
4/10/09
2/26/09
Not fud, just galling
From the WSJ funny pages.
Greenwald puts the blame where it belongs, too: It's "more about our political culture" than about the vile one. But it also says a lot about modern media. Maybe my memories are too misty, but once upon a time crapola like this would been aborted before the linotype guys ever saw it.
2/12/09
Anyone else
find it odd the all-American crop was from China? So much for organic.
1/29/09
Things are bad
when Velveeta starts to look like cheese. Kraft guy should know it's going for at least five times less than real Cheddar, though.
12/27/08
12/20/08
12/10/08
12/6/08
Not fud, but thank allah
someone said it, and incredibly well. Everyone's dancing around as if she only got the aftermath wrong. The sumbitch was eating pretzels at the switch.
12/4/08
Is it any easier
if it's food insecurity rather than the H word? (Saw this in the Journal of "lucky duckies," not the NYT.)
9/6/08
All that eating in Italy
didn't do Panchito much good.
"There are a few exceptions to the decline of Chinese food in U.S. urban centers. . . . We read recently about a reputedly excellent new place in the city's Garment District, but on closer inspection, Szechuan Gourmet turned out to be a sloppy, indifferent rendition of the great, hearty food of the earthquake-plaged province . . . The ma po dou fu at Sezchuan Gourmet was muddy in flavor, beef-starved, with barely a shred of green."
6/18/08
She wasn't stealing
She was marketing. Would anyone have gone to the site if not for the purloined recipe? The best part of this, which is an alternative to the WSJ's piece, is the breakdown of candy consumers. I think I qualify as a Detached Occasionalist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
